program takes bait from the Pentagon and reports truly delusional
claims from Missile Defense officials:
Nightline: Inside a remote and
secretive base, the frontline of National Missile Defense. Can it
really shoot North Korean missiles out of the sky? Imagine hitting a
hole in one, when the hole is hurtling at 15,000 mph through space.
That's the tremendous technical challenge of missile defense, shooting
down enemy missiles before they hit the United States…Missile Defense
is seen by many as a big priority. But will it work?
Alaska, Fort Greely, about 100 miles southeast of
Fairbanks…this remote place is the frontline where the Pentagon is
racing to put dozens of missiles in the ground that it hopes will
defend the nation...Nightline is the first TV crew ever allowed into
what was once a very secretive site…Silo 111, a live interceptor
missile ready to fire…a kill vehicle up on top, is one of 14 here at
Ft. Greely, and the soldiers here say they are confident that if they
had to they could fire one of these missiles and hit an incoming
missile…The Pentagon wanted us to see all of the silos, command center,
and test missiles because they have a story they want to get out - it
works, they claim, what was once derisively called 'Star Wars,' they
say, is now ready for battle.
Col. Tom Besch, Director, Missile Defense
Agency, Alaska Region: For the first time the U.S. has the
capability to defend itself against incoming missiles.
Nightline: You're confident
that, right now, if any country popped off a missile at this country,
the 14 missiles that are out there right now, you'd be able to press a
button and up they'd go and do their mission?
Col. Tom Besch: I'm absolutely
Col. Tom Besch: I am.
Nightline: But there are plenty
Theresa Hitchens, Dir., Center for
Defense Information: "The missile defense interceptors that
are in the ground at Ft. Greely and Vanderberg [AFB] have absolutely no
proven capability against an enemy missile under operationally
Nightline: Over the course of
25 years, and nearly $100 billion, there have been dozens of tests of
various parts of the system and many have failed. That's because, in
practice, it's a ferociously complex challenge. Some critics say it's
impossible, like hitting a bullet with a bullet.
Nightline: Col. Ted Heldreth is
commander of the 49th Missile Defense Battalion. What's your level of
confidence, percentage-wise, that your soldiers could shoot a missile
out of the sky?
Col. Ted Heldreth: I'd bet my
family's life on it.
[NOTE: Pity the kids who have this robot
automaton for a father!]
Nightline: Your systems are all
working in a way that will knock those missiles down, you say?
Maj. Roger Hoselton, 49th Missile Defense
Battalion: Um, [PAUSE] from where I'm sitting, [LONG PAUSE] I
Nightline: The problem, say
critics like Theresa Hitchens of the Center for Defense Information, is
that in the real world an enemy like North Korea could easily foil
Theresa Hitchens: If you have
enough incoming missiles, you can overwhelm a certain size battery of
Nightline: An even bigger
challenge: counter measures, cheap balloon decoys, released by a
missile while in space and designed to look and act exactly like the
real threat. And then there's the controversy over testing. In every
test so far the defenders at Ft. Greely and elsewhere have had advanced
information about the simulated attacks.
Nightline: Do you think these
tests are rigged?
Theresa Hitchens: I think
they're scripted…I'm saying they are scripted tests.
Nightline: The controversy
REASON FOR SEPTEMBER 11TH
Repeatly prior to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in
the United States, media had been reporting the results of the
Pentagon's ongoing tests of the National Missile Defense (NMD) system
being built. Most of the tests failed. However, following the Sept.
11th attacks, the "Patriot Act" went into effect in the U.S. and an
iron curtain of secracy descended around the Pentagon's Missile Defense
project - a news blackout that was the direct result of, and made
possible by, the Sept. 11th explosions. More than five years passed
with no more media coverage of the missile tests for this big-ticket,
taxpayer financed, Pentagon project. After "9/11" the Pentagon was no
longer required to prove that the system can even work. Then,
after five and a half years of secracy, the Pentagon simply calls ABC
News to announce, "OK, we're ready now, the whole system works - but we
don't have to demonstrate any evidence that it works - so just
take our word for it - the sheeple are too distracted to care
whether or not it works anyway, even though we wasted a hundred billion
of their tax dollars on this."
What keeps entering my mind are all of those
acedemics and websites that feature experts presenting evidence that
the Sept. 11th attacks were "inside jobs" that U.S. government
officials had to be involved with, and were complicit with.
Documentaries like Loose Change, 9/11 Mysteries, Evidence to
the Contrary, In Plane Sight, Painful Deception, Road To 9/11, Truth
and Lies of 9/11, Money Masters (as well as documentaries
about secret societies in general, like Riddles In Stone
or Skull & Bones or The
Lightbringers), and especially the new movie Zeitgeist
(which sums them all up) - and many others that detail evidence of
official misinformation regarding the attacks - all of these are
conspicuous in their absence from main stream media. The information is
available on the web, but millions of people aren't on line and their
opinions remain grossly manipulated by the spin of mass media owners. A
lawyer once explained the concept to me as the "Kennedy Defense" -
meaning "just ignore it and act as if it doesn't exist" (a strategy
used during one of the Kennedy klan's lawsuits). This is exactly how
media respnds to Rock Prophecy, as well as the on
line evidence detailing official lies in the 9/11 Commision's
conclusions about the Sept. 11th attacks - just act like this evidence,
and the millions of people interested in the evidence, don't exist.
There are two points here:
1) Mogul-controlled mass media conceals evidence
and theories about the September 11th events being an "inside job."
2) If/when it is proven that U.S. government
officials were complicit with the Sept. 11th explosions, we will
discover that the reason for the attacks was
specifically to enact the Patriot Act for the purpose
of allowing the Ft. Greely Missile Defense effort to proceed without
any media reports about the project. Our dominator rulers
needed to deveolp National Missile ("asteroid") Defense - AT ALL COSTS
- and WITHOUT any scrutiny from defense experts, like Ted Postal, who
blow the whistle on lies that government officials promote about the
purpose of the Misssile Defense Agency. - See:
The real reason for Ft. Greely
is ASTEROID DEFENSE - but the Bush adminstration had determined to
conceal this from Americans - and the best way to do that was to
orchestrate a hi-profile "terrorist" attack that would enable Bush to
spin martial law as "the Patriot Act" and close down all media reports
about the Missile Defense Agency. Then, years later (in "2007"), simply
announce to the media: "TA-DA! abra-cadabra - IT WORKS! and we
don't have to prove it to you!" Get some low-brow grunt on
the base to say he'd "bet his family's life on it" - so sure, now all
the TV sheeple can go back to sleep and believe our government can
shoot down missiles. It can't, but that was never the purpose anyway.
They're trying to find a way to launch missiles at incoming rocks from
space, while at the same time build a safe haven on the Moon for the
elite that will cost trillions of our tax dollars. So they have to lie
to us and keep everyone calm and distracted while they use the herd of
worker slaves to finance their plan, without loss of morale in the
workforce from people panicking over the asteroid impact to come. So
give us all reasons to conclude it won't happen - misinformation and
outright official lies to spin our opinions against our own interests -
which is the primary purpose and polished expertise of the dominator
elite who control our state/corporate/military/media nexus. They're on
their way to lunar condos, at our expense.
Welcome to George Orwell's "1984" - the reality is
that, by the calendar year "1984" Orwell's totalitarian visions had
come true, and the manipulation of the masses was so effective that the
entire herd of sheeple were by then too hypnotized and brain-trained